What else am I up to?
DAREarts empowers children and youth from underserved communities across Canada through arts-based leadership programs.
Popular Posts
-
*Please Note: My experience with filing for the LMIA was based on the previous rules prior to Nov. 30, 2014, however I have updated the li...
-
The time has come to begin preparing for your nanny's arrival...how exciting! Providing your nanny with quality orientation and tr...
-
I have received several requests from readers to write on the topic of nanny sharing. After a LOT of research, I have put a post together...
-
It's a common question to ask whether the cost savings of a live-in nanny are worth giving up the space in your home and having a...
-
The 7th step in the sponsorship process is to send your future nanny the positive LMO and supporting documents so that they can proceed wi...
-
*Updated LICP guidelines requires you to post on the Government of Canada's Job Bank, use 2 or more additional methods of recruitment (...
-
*Based on costs in 2014. Updates include: minimum wage increase to $11.25/hr and the cessation of room/board deductions. We live in a coz...
-
Welcoming a new nanny into your home can be an exciting and anxious time for everyone involved. Want to start your relationship off...
-
So just to demonstrate my DIY gusto, I thought I'd post a little sampler of what's to come. I'll be honest, this DIY sampler has...
-
Aside from the job bank which requires a fairly straightforward and lacklustre ad written specific to their guidelines (see their website...
My question is if I get paid by both families separately do they both have to pay me min. wage?
ReplyDeleteThank you in advance.
Hi Brittany,
DeleteThanks for your comment. This area of expertise isn't really in my wheelhouse, but it would depend on how you're employed by the families. See the following three scenarios:
1) If you are working under the live-in caregiver program contracted by a joint employer (ie. two families who have co-applied for an LMIA to hire you) then they do not need to both pay you minimum wage.
2) If you are working as a live-out nanny under a PR status, open work permit (or as a Canadian) for two entirely separate families (ie. there is no joint employment and you don't watch both families' kids at the same time) then yes they both need to pay you minimum wage.
3) If you are working for two families where you watch both of their children at the same time then they do not need to each pay you minimum wage (and in fact this would be uncommon) as they would pay a joint wage. The benefit (typically) to the caregiver is that two families (say one family with 1 child and the other with 2 children, so 3 children in total) may be willing to pay you $17-20/hr because for each family that's still a great deal, whereas one family hiring you to watch their 3 children may only offer $15/hr. If each family paid the going rate for a single family wage then there wouldn't be a benefit to them. Most families see it as a cost savings to them while offering a caregiver a higher wage, so it's a win-win.
Always happy to answer any other questions that you have. :-)
Hi,
ReplyDeleteI'm currently working for a family with two boys. The older boy is attending school and I am only caring for one now in the mornings. We are activitiely looking for a share for just the morning. We have the weekly rate down, but Id like to know how the vacation would work. As of now, I get all paid holidays, two weeks vacation, sick days and any days the family takes off. Now, would the share family be responsible for paying one of my weeks vacation? How about days where the family(with the boys) decides to take a random day off(which they do often) and spend the day with the kids and I'm not needed, what happens to the other child and would she still be responsible for paying me?
The share would take place in the boys' home and only be 3/4 days a week in the mornings only.
Thank you,
Jen
Hi Jen, great questions! Yes typically the other family would share the cost of your vacation pay/time off, however that is something that would be decided jointly by the employers. I would say it is fair that you maintain the same number of vacation days though. If one family decides to spend the day with the kids, I would expect that you would still be needed to care for the other child (in a different location) so you would no longer have that time off. I hope that answers your questions! Sorry my comment was so late, I just found a new spot in my blog editor with lots of questions that hadn't come through to me until now, but hopefully your question might be helpful for others too!
DeleteHi,
ReplyDeleteFor the past year, I've worked for a family with two boys. The eldest is attending school part time now and I am only caring for the little one in the morning. Their parents cannot afford to pay me and the school so we are looking for another child that I care for along with their youngest in the mornings only.
As far as weekly salary is concerned, I'll receive an even amount from each and be paid by each family.
My question is about vacation? I currently have paid holidays, sick days, two weeks, and any days that they take off. Now, would the other family be responsible for paying one of my weeks vacation? How about days when the family(with the boys) take off random days(which they do often) and Im not needed that day? Since the share will be taking place in their house, do I contact the other family and say I will not be caring for their child that day because the other family took off? Are they still responsible to pay me? Also, is there any else I should considered before agreeing to a share?
I'm confused. Hope you can help.
Thank you,
Jen
Hi Jen,
DeleteThanks for your comment and I'm so sorry that I didn't get back to you when you posted. Your comment slipped through the cracks and I didn't see it until now. I'm sure you've sorted this out by now, but to answer your question, these are all factors that are agreed upon on a case-by-case basis. As such, it would be the employers' responsibility to negotiate how they cover your vacation pay etc. As long as you receive it, it's really not relevant who it comes from. In some situations the employers may agree that only one family pays the vacation time if, for example, that family perceived greater benefit (cost savings etc) to their family in agreeing to the nanny share.
Really and truly, the employers need to be jointly managing your role, ie. it shouldn't ever be your responsibility to contact the second employer and let them know that you can't care for their child because the primary employer took days off; it should be the two employers who correspond together and then notify you of changes to your schedule. You need to ensure that both employers are on the same page, have pre-determined and written out a joint employer contract or agreement with one another, and understand that they have a responsibility to you to jointly manage you otherwise your role could quickly deteriorate to something quite stressful where you end up managing two families instead of one joint employer managing you.
This has been very helpful I have two follow-up questions on payment:
ReplyDelete1) If one child is out for any reason (vacation, sick, parent early pick-up, etc) - is there a different hourly rate for the single child since the scope is 1:1? For example, the parents of nanny share A + B pay $10 per hour per kid, if child A is not present for the day then the child B will be a higher amount?
2) When both sets of parents are out on holiday - is the nanny typically paid its regular wage?
Glad this has been helpful to you!
DeleteI would say to answer your first question that this is very individual. I think most families would decide that if one child is pulled out then they still receive the same wage (I would think this is fair, otherwise the nanny's wage goes up and down based on something out of their control - illness of children). Having said that, if someone were pursuing a nanny share for a different reason (my husband and I being a prime example because our lifestyle is very flexible) then we may be looking for a share where we don't pay for days that we don't use, but that the nanny would know this going into the arrangement.
And yes when both families are on holiday, the nanny would typically either take holiday at the same time (agreed upon in contracts ahead of time) or be paid a regular wage.
DeleteThanks for all your comphrehensive information! Wow. You have done a lot of work here.
ReplyDeleteCould you quote your resource regarding your response to minimum wage per family requirements?
#3 on Aug 28th 2015....If you are working for two families where you watch both of their children at the same time then they do not need to each pay you minimum wage (and in fact this would be uncommon) as they would pay a joint wage. The benefit (typically) to the caregiver is that two families (say one family with 1 child and the other with 2 children, so 3 children in total) may be willing to pay you $17-20/hr because for each family that's still a great deal, whereas one family hiring you to watch their 3 children may only offer $15/hr. If each family paid the going rate for a single family wage then there wouldn't be a benefit to them. Most families see it as a cost savings to them while offering a caregiver a higher wage, so it's a win-win.
Hi there, thanks for your comment. the source is via 1:1 interviews with the families who contributed to this article. The interviews were done via telephone and email.
DeleteThe underlying concept is of joint employership. When you register as joint employers you are only required to file one business number etc and are considered one business/employer. As such, you are only required to pay one minimum wage as you are not separate employer entities.
Hi Jenn,
ReplyDeleteWe are setting up our third nanny share arrangement. It has worked so well for us, and you have definitely hit all of the points to think about! So well done, congratulations for compiling all of the details. I have a question for you about this one point below. My question is, do you know how the CRA would see that as income for the individuals vs the business transaction. How do you keep that separate on your personal taxes?
"Sole employer. One family acts as the "sole employer". This means that they file for a business number, manage paying the nanny and CRA remittance, obtain WSIB, receive payment from secondary family, and file the childcare expenses on their personal income tax (some families provide the secondary family with a receipt so that they may also file and some claim the entire childcare tax credit themselves)."
Hi there, thanks for your kind words and my apologies for the delay in reply! (I just found a section in my blog editor with a ton of questions that never came through to me in my alerts). Even though you establish yourself as a business for CRA purposes (getting a business number, WSIB etc), you still claim the cost associated with the nanny on your personal taxes as childcare costs. I find it a tiny bit silly how it all works because when you call to obtain the business number etc it is classed differently and they immediately help walk you through the steps if you are a family employing a nanny because they understand that you're not 'really' a business. Hope that helps!
DeleteOk. We have done nanny shares over the years with several different families but haven't done this. But now that our city's min wage has gone up to $10.50/hr (and rising) we may need to do this so it doesn't look like we are paying her less than minimum wage. Do you mean you file a business # with the IRS or you have to form an LLC with each family you share with?
ReplyDeleteHi there, thanks for your comment. The business number information is applicable to the Canadian system, and unfortunately I'm not familiar with this piece of the process in the U.S, but all the best and please feel free to share the info here in a comment once you get it for other blog readers based out of the U.S!
DeleteIf I agree to do a nanny share for two families one family has a one-year-old baby and they use me six hours a day four days a week the other family has a newborn and uses me three days a week three hours a day. How would it be most beneficial for me to be paid since the times are different one family only use in a few hours it doesn't seem fair the normal 30% difference per family as that would be a decrease in pay for me.
ReplyDeleteHi Julie, thanks for your comment. The wage piece really can be so individual, but I think most families doing nanny shares don't want to pay for time not used when it is this type of nanny share (hours split vs. home share). Because it sounds like some of the time overlaps with multiple kids and some with only 1, I would think it fair to determine a set hourly rate for you and then the families can decide how they divvy that up. So for example, your wage wouldn't vary day-to-day, perhaps you are paid $17/hour which accommodates some days of more challenging care and some with only one child, and then the families might decide to split that up between themselves with a 30/70 split. Does that make sense? I'm not sure if I clearly articulated that.
DeleteHi Jenn - I live in a rental apartment in Santa Monica, CA and have been doing a nanny share with a friend's son and mine for more than a year. Our landlord sent an email saying that we were running "a babysitting business" and asked us to stop. I've never heard of a nanny share qualifying as a business and can't find anyone else whose had this problem with a landlord in my research. Our lease does say we can't use the premise for "carrying on a business" but again, I can't believe a casual nanny share with two kids and one nanny qualifies as that! Any ideas or insights would be greatly appreciated.
ReplyDeleteHi Jenn - I have been doing a nanny share with a friend's son and mine for more than a year. We host at my rented home in Santa Monica, CA. Recently my landlord came by without my knowledge and started asking my nanny questions about our arrangement. He then sent me an email saying that we were running a "babysitting business" and asked us to stop. I've never heard of a nanny share with 2 kids/1 nanny qualifying as a business. Have you ever heard of a situation like this before? Thanks for any insight you can provide!
ReplyDeleteHi -
ReplyDeleteI am not sure if this post is too old to get a response. We are about to start a nanny share and the other family wants us to put an agreement in place stating that neither family will sue the other family in the event of an issue.
The language that the family is using is very broad and we don't feel comfortable signing it. Have you seen this before and is there a targeted template we should use?
Thanks!!
Thanks for your question Casey. I have certainly never ever heard of this! I can only speak for me, but I definitely wouldn't feel comfortable signing it, and might also take it as a red flag. The family must have some pretty significant trust issues. The nanny share relationship is one of fine balance and should really be done with a family where there is mutual understanding and trust or it can quickly go awry. I hope for your sake that they're just a bit paranoid and it's not a sign of anything negative to come, but I wouldn't sign a document like that. It is very typical (and advisable) to have a joint agreement that you both sign that covers everything from how sick days work to payment, but getting into law suit territory seems very strange to me. Can you talk to the family about what is underlying that? I can understand that they may just be really nervous about taking on the liability for another child, but on the flip side, if something ever did happen that was genuinely rooted in negligence you would want to take legal action. Best of luck, it does sound like a tricky situation!
DeleteHi -
ReplyDeleteWe are about to enter a nanny share where the other family is hosting. They would like us to sign the following agreement:
Gentleman agreement: Families agree that the house, nursery, play equipment and environment are safe for the children. Families agree to not sue any of the other family as none of the families will be responsible for any injury to the children. This can include such things as: fire, theft, vandalism, rain, water, falling tree branches, earthquake, criminal or negligent acts of others, or any other cause. Families are advised to carry their own insurance..
We think this is too broad and do not feel comfortable signing this. Any thoughts?